In a significant ruling aimed at upholding constitutional propriety, the Supreme Court of India on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the “excessive powers” being exercised by Micro-Observers during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal. A Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant observed that no “Extra Election Authority” can be allowed to function outside the established legal framework.

During a marathon 90-minute hearing, the apex court addressed allegations that Micro-Observers were overriding the decisions of Electoral Registration Officers (EROs). “The Micro-Observers are there to assist, not to act as a Super-Authority,” the Chief Justice remarked. The court passed a mandatory directive stating that the final decision regarding the inclusion or deletion of names in the voter list rests solely with the EROs.

Key Highlights of the Order:

• Role Clarification: Micro-Observers are strictly prohibited from issuing orders or influencing the final scrutiny; their role is limited to observation and reporting.
• ERO Autonomy: The court re-established that EROs are the primary legal authorities for electoral roll management as per the Representation of the People Act.
• Check on Bias: The ruling ensures that the modification process remains transparent and free from any external administrative pressure.

This judgment is seen as a major intervention by the Supreme Court to safeguard the neutral role of local election officials. By restraining the “over-reach” of Micro-Observers, the court has sent a stern message to the Election Commission to ensure that administrative protocols are strictly followed ahead of the crucial upcoming polls.